Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is said that globalization benefits the business world, however, its subtle downsides should not be neglected. I completely concur with this notion for the possibility of losing cultural identity, leading to the assimilation that many civilizations may face.

For one thing, global cooperation facilitates economic prosperity is an indisputable fact. Private sectors are allowed to collaborate and international trades are generally prompted by modern industrial society, which will generate more opportunities to increase sales volume. More contracts are approved and projects to expand the market of companies are now able to be implemented. Furthermore, given the open policies of governments in many countries that incentivize offshore businesses to exchange information and profession, enterprises are indeed the beneficiaries as they are allowed to coordinate the advantages of both sides and in turn, bolster the social economic growth.

For another, notwithstanding the aforementioned economic merits, globalization is a potential threat to the loss of cultural identity. The result of this trend is that since businesses start to penetrate more regions, it will entail their traditions and rituals to be adopted in such alien environments. Businesses operate based on their labor forces, however, they unconsciously reform the thinking of the employees who are born indiginous people to rigidly comply with the company’s traditions. Working with foreign colleagues will gradually change their behavior to become identical with others as to adapt a novel concept which is generally followed. Profoundly, their region-specific identity will lose when assimilation has negatively affected one’s individuality.

To conclude, globalization positively facilitates economic growth. Nonetheless, the existential threat of losing cultural identity is indeed a dire consequence that individuals must be aware of.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-04 sonnn 89 view
2021-10-18 leanguyen 50 view
Essays by user sonnn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... what extent do you agree or disagree? It is said that globalization benefits t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion that many civilizations may face. For one thing, global cooperation facili...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, bolster the social economic growth. For another, notwithstanding the aforeme...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atively affected one’s individuality. To conclude, globalization positively fa...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, as to, for one thing

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99322033898 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34884716923 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3425775607 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287768863347 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113240084002 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168610788731 0.0667982634062 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232557697531 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210407345772 0.056905535591 370% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.