Governments give lots of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been spent better elsewhere.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Some would argue that governments should allocate substantial amounts of money to cater for artists, such as singers and movie stars. However, others believe that it is unwise to do so and this hefty budgets should instead be spent on other sectors. This essay will first discuss both these views before coming to the conclusion that government legislators should balance their spending between all areas.
On the one hand, it is believed that spending large sums of money on artists’ performances, such as movies making and music, is a great way of investment. That is to say, governments sponsor arts as a way to generate profits that would contribute to increasing the local income. Artists also play a significant role in promoting the cultures and traditions of their nations through arts achievements and that is why many people consider them as the ambassadors of their heritage and their local culture. Thus, they are worth the money being spent on them. For instance, the latest Indian movie of Sharokhan yielded millions of dollars for the local government and familiarized many people with the Indian culture.
On the other hand, it is believed that government rulers should spend more on other sectors, such as building more hospitals and schools. Spending more money to promote people’s wellbeing is more beneficial because it looks after the local community and the future generation rather than frittering away money on idle art performances that are deemed to be luxurious and recreational. For example, Singapore has become one of the developed nations by dint of improving its standards of living and focusing on the healthcare sector and education.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that both of the latter views are equally valid and governments should balance their spending on human’s essentials and entertainment. Art is an integral part of our lives that amuses and inspires us, while educations and healthcare facilities are indispensable for our existence.
- Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give y 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29467084639 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87565574044 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561128526646 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8525320907 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119282135379 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452877520495 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349742820219 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074329133479 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320039735737 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.