The government's investment in art, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
The public spending has always been a thought-provoking issue in all the societies. It is argued that the governments ought to allocate resources to community facilities rather than squander money on entertainment. Even though, I believe that art may be crucial for certain demographics of population, the prime concern of the authorities is rendering the decent living standards to the nation.
On the one hand, a comprehensive individual’s development is impossible without cultural interference. This means that professional career along with day-to-day chores are unable to provide entire fulfilment to a person. Throughout the history from the ancient Greek amphitheatres to the modern digital multimedia, humanity has craved for amusement that cultivates self-identification as a species. For example, during the Renaissance period many prominent inventors and discoverers scooped inspiration from art, which enables them to perform their works that left significant footprint in history. In other words, many modern social boons would have been otherwise impossible without existence of art.
On the other hand, some countries opt to contribute to art sacrificing vital funds that can be rendered to education, medicine and other important social institutes. In other words, entertainment industries may be exorbitantly expensive for the state budget, while the production of artworks is surely subjective. Proceeding from this, in terms of purely financial perspective, such governmental initiatives are highly unlikely to pay off. On the contrary, the returns from social benefits deriving from strong public services are explicit and encompass entire nation’s wellbeing. Thus, there is no doubt that community facilities reinforcement to be on the top of political agenda.
In conclusion, although no universal opinion exists to the question of whether country leaders should allot taxpayers’ money to public institutes or entertainment, I am of the opinion that a society is clearly better off from the well-funded public services.
- The most important aim of science ought to be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 73
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want Is this a good way to raise children What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older 73
- You have recently travelled on a train and unfortunately left your luggage Write a letter to the manager of the Lost and Found department of the railway regarding the luggage you accidentally left on the train In your letter give details of your train tri 73
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecent living standards to the nation. On the one hand, a comprehensive individ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impossible without existence of art. On the other hand, some countries opt to...
^^^^
Line 9, column 626, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
... Thus, there is no doubt that community facilities reinforcement to be on the top of polit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 56, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...although no universal opinion exists to the question of whether country leaders should allot taxpayers&...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87417218543 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40211928007 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652317880795 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1460082958 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111754125471 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320350950968 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371155554162 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709894685497 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356194758908 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.