Governments in many countries are urgently seeking ways to reduce unemployment in rural areas. What are the most effective ways to do this? Which measure do you think would be the single most effective step that governments could take?
Nowadays one of the most contentious topics is how the government should wrestle with the problem of high unemployment in the countryside. This essay presents possible solutions along with my own perspective on the most effective governmental measure.
The authorities of many countries, who pay heed to the lack of vacancies in rural areas, propose several remedies which seem to increase the level of employment. First of all, some local governments organize refresher courses as a significant share of people, who were fired, face challenges with the low level of their qualification or obsolete skills. This solution is on the brink of becoming more popular because of the appearance of artificial intelligence, which is suggested to change drastically human’s contribution to the work-process. Second, the government can subsidize local enterprises providing demand for their output and hence, giving work to thousands of inhabitants. For instance, purchasing steel, iron and other metals by the Russian Federation in the period of crisis supported several city-forming plants in Siberia. Finally, if the government found new markets for agricultural products or any other goods from rural employers, there wouldn’t exist problems with unemployment. Thus, the government should make agreements with foreign consumers about supplies from its countryside.
I am inclined to believe that the best measure which can be adopted by any country is to develop not only the most crowded cities but every region of the state. If the government can guarantee sustainable growth for all areas, new businesses will be launched, unemployment will cease to be a problem and the general prosperity will climb.
To sum up, in my opinion, there are a lot of effective ways how government can reduce unemployment in rural areas. At the same time, as far as unemployment is the ramification of economic policy, the implementation of these measures can be really arduous work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-17 | Nguyễn Thị Kiều Trinh | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | Nguyễn Thị Kiều Trinh | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | AnnaH | 92 | view |
- Jumbo jet 84
- It is generally agreed that fewer people today write letters (through the mail or post) compared with the 20th century. What factors have led to this situation? What will the impact be on the lives of future generations? 84
- Some people think learning musical instruments is a waste of time, while others think it is beneficial in many ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- School territory changes planned by 2024 84
- Who should pay for homes for people who lost theirs in disasters 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, really, second, so, thus, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47882736156 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15623917805 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625407166124 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0069729272 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256211867438 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847013929234 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661433076866 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16095928535 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432135202812 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.