Who should pay for homes for people who lost theirs in disasters
Nowadays one of the most contentious topics is who should cover the expenses on the accommodation for people who lost their homes because of natural disasters. Debates about this issue spark bitter controversy but I am inclined to believe that the government should provide temporary asylums and permanent housing to everybody.
First of all, in the majority of both developed and emerging countries, people pay high taxes to support the government’s work and to spend this money on wrestling with national problems. Bearing in the mind that in some countries such as Belgium and France tax rates are extremely high and can exceed 50% of family’s income (not only in households with one breadwinner but also in double-income families), it seems obvious that in case of catastrophes the government is the one who should help its nation.
Second, the government’s policy should contribute to the sustainable prosperity of all people, and the accommodation as one human’s basic needs is a cornerstone of a person’s welfare. If everybody had a roof above his or her head, he or she would develop themselves and make a contribution to society. Thus, the government can prevent committing crimes (for example, robberies, which can be done for earning money to the mortgage).
Some people are convinced that national money should not be spent on personal things like private houses as it does not lead to any significant alterations in society. However, in my opinion, when natural disasters happened, all members of society should be more sensitive and relate to these expenses as to charity.
To sum up, I honestly believe that earthquakes, tsunamis, wildfires and other catastrophes which can cause a human's homelessness are problems of the whole nation without any exception. That is why the government should be responsible for the reconstruction of people’s homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | Fiona | 89 | view |
- School territory changes planned by 2024 84
- It is generally agreed that fewer people today write letters (through the mail or post) compared with the 20th century. What factors have led to this situation? What will the impact be on the lives of future generations? 84
- Volcanic island formation 78
- Governments in many countries are urgently seeking ways to reduce unemployment in rural areas What are the most effective ways to do this Which measure do you think would be the single most effective step that governments could take 92
- Some people think that paying tax is already a huge contribution to society. Others believe that there are other responsibilities. Discuss both views and present your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nd other catastrophes which can cause a humans homelessness are problems of the whole ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, however, if, second, so, thus, as to, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35548172757 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19610307856 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607973421927 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5434083231 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.545454545 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27622513193 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101559385839 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130106753761 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145626918927 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103822621716 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.