School territory changes planned by 2024
The diagram demonstrates how a school territory looked like in 2004 and what alterations have planned to be done by 2024. Generally, the number of pupils and hence, facilities for them will increase.
In 2004, when only 600 students learned at this school, there is no road with vehicles inside schoolyard. The only road leading to the school ended in a car park where was the main entrance to the first school building. To go to the second school building students had to cross the path that led to the large sports field. Whole remaining area consisted of the garden.
Twenty years after the site is going to change drastically. First, at the background of 40% increase in student’s number a new building - the third one - is expected to appear in the place where the sports field used to be. Two old buildings will be linked, meanwhile, a new sports field which is almost half fewer than the previous one will be separated by the road. This road, which lies right in the middle of the schoolyard, will connect the old one with the second car park.
- Who should pay for homes for people who lost theirs in disasters 84
- School territory changes planned by 2024 84
- Some people think learning musical instruments is a waste of time, while others think it is beneficial in many ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people think that paying tax is already a huge contribution to society. Others believe that there are other responsibilities. Discuss both views and present your opinion. 84
- Solar collector 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, look, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50516668872 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0348398027 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186146841769 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676378249758 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959947902502 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13332543606 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913629766679 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.