Nowadays one of the most contentious topics among parents, foster parents and guardians is whether playing musical instruments is a paramount skill for any kid. Debates about this issue spark bitter controversy but I am inclined to believe that there are a lot of skills that transcend this one.
First of all, modern society requires a range of essential qualities and transferable skills from children which can outweigh playing musical instruments. For instance, every child is expected to be tech-savvy and hardwired for learning languages, and to have lateral thinking. This knowledge is crucial for successful, and if a child did not master them, it could become a deterrent for potential tertiary education or tempting job-offer. At the same time, a high level of musical education can be appreciated only in a narrow list of professional areas.
Second, the Internet gives millennials – the last generation – access to any occupations, online courses and distance learning. Thus, instead of musical courses that for a long time were taken everywhere even in the hinterland because of the abundance of musical instruments, in the digital era any pursuits and studies can be chosen by youngsters.
Some people are convinced that musical instruments are the cornerstone of the sense of beauty and the transmission of social memes. However, in my opinion, there are a lot of viable alternatives that can convey social norms to children. One of them is theater, which has become a popular leisure activity among Russian pupils.
To sum up, musical instruments are, undoubtedly, one of the primary parts of any culture and it is vital to hand the ability to play them down between generations. Nonetheless, I entirely believe that the desire to play the piano, the guitar, the flute, etc. should be indicated by children without parental pressure.
- Governments in many countries are urgently seeking ways to reduce unemployment in rural areas What are the most effective ways to do this Which measure do you think would be the single most effective step that governments could take 92
- It is generally agreed that fewer people today write letters (through the mail or post) compared with the 20th century. What factors have led to this situation? What will the impact be on the lives of future generations? 84
- Solar collector 78
- Who should pay for homes for people who lost theirs in disasters 84
- Jumbo jet 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, thus, for instance, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89923361521 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5001987803 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106774800765 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355801238467 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394871045626 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581133877292 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244780915268 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.