Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that scientific studies should be funded and controlled by governments rather than private organizations. While I agree that national authorities should keep supervision and contribute financial aids for science and their research, I also hold an opinion that other units should be able to participate in supporting scientific studies.
On the one hand, I support the idea that funding and controlling scientific research should be the responsibility of governments. Without any doubt, it might become less complicated and time-consuming to find and nutrient the most talented people in the country, if governments directly launch a campaign in order to use all national resources for dedicating science and its research. In terms of significantly large funds, governments tend to more easily appeal from the communities, compared with other private units. Moreover, authorities could ensure the equality of those scientific studies’ goals that would be employed for the general public's benefits instead of individuals’ ones. The more responsibility governments are capable of taking over, the more beliefs people get, which creates a firm bond between citizens and their governments.
However, I also agree that private organizations should take part in funding scientific research. By all accounts, hardly anyone would be fast enough to keep up with the latest trends of all aspects including scientific applications like a business one. Private units would be willing to invest in the highly risky yet profit-promising scientific research. Therefore, there are more and more opportunities for apprentice scientists to approach favorable conditions not only for the research environment but also for their daily needs. The Pfizer vaccine, which used to be rejected by the Russian government, for example, is invested and developed by private pharmaceutical companies in America.
In conclusion, scientific studies should be concerned by both the authorities and privates. By funding and attending from all perspectives, it could make a breakthrough in later life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | vylam | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ivantran | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-05 | mayank2212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | el-naz | 78 | view |
- The majority of news is bad news such as wars famines accidents and crimes Why do you think that is Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news 84
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 67
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 84
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68051118211 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21443540992 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7201129889 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396804713143 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14555337802 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109561089728 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243627399585 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874817268446 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.