Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some proponents indicate that government bodies shouldn't invest in roads but in railway lines. Personally, I completely disagree with this view since roads are more convenient for the public to travel and it foster economic growth in rural areas.
To begin with, roads create more convenience for the society than railways. That is because it takes less time for individuals to travel to their destinations, especially to locations that are rural. Train stations are usually constructed in cities and areas that have high population density, therefore, people who live in small towns or hamlets would have to travel to those places before reaching their wanted destination, for example. If those persons drive their private cars, they will have to travel less and could arrive sooner.
Moreover, rural sites' economy could be boosted with the development of roads. As visitors could visit those regions more conveniently by automobiles, the number of visitors would increase, and local people could create revenue by selling souvenirs and providing recreational services. In addition, roads could help local people to deliver their crops or local goods to other regions. Cao Bang, a Vietnamese mountainous area, for instance, used to be a poor region before the government build roads to their villages and create an income for several men and women. As the economy in those areas grows, the national economy would grow as a whole.
In conclusion, I believe that national and local authorities should allocate resources to develop roads rather than railways because they provide convenience for travelers and boost economic growth in certain regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The two charts below show the proportion of qualified graduates in a particular country To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and if necessary make a comparison
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 61
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ponents indicate that government bodies shouldnt invest in roads but in railway lines. P...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fosters'?
Suggestion: fosters
...venient for the public to travel and it foster economic growth in rural areas. To beg...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35769230769 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63984881672 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1359854499 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.083333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132313703677 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551251558182 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585955165457 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104305123297 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627932967417 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.