Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The development of road systems and the possession of individual vehicles these days has become so common all over the world that people think it is obvious and get deal with it. However, some others do not believe so and an attitude for that is the government should focus on investing and developing railway systems rather than roads. In my opinion, i agree with that for the following main reasons.
The first urgent reason is saving. The only move by railways undoubtedly consumes less energy than the amount of energy used for individual vehicles by the corresponding number of people moving. While the issue of energy crisis has always been the cause of mode trade wars and competition from developed countries, the development of railways system should be encouraged. The advancement of technology has led us to the move of the subways based on the principle of the magnet's propulsion force a few years ago, which in turn exposed a more positive future in giving up the means of transport due to fossil fuels. Beside saving money, railways also help us save time. For example, if there are numerous of workers who work in the same area at the same time, it is obvious that moving on the same route is smarter and more reasonable solution than each person moving by herself. Convenience and freedom to go anywhere by personal is true but that also means the streets are never free from crowded and vehicles, dust, which create a great pressure on human health and environment.
The following reason which made me give railways more support than roads is the safety of railways. Normally, highways are built along the forest edges without any barriers or signals to ensure safety for drivers when the fauna pass by. Along with the speed of moving on highways is like a flash, the driver has only two choices, either to turn the steering wheel to ensure the safety of species or to accept killing animal, and both are too dangerous and are faulty methods if the driver is forced to do that, even some of them are animal lovers. It is cruel when humans kill wild animals even though it is the only way for them to save themselves and thus, they trade naturally for their own convenience. Meanwhile, the railway systems, especially subways, can avoid almost of these incidents. With barriers built up on both sides of the tracks and signaling horns, accidents are limited to the minimum.
Subsequently, the development of railways bring countless of benefits from helping people reduce lots of waste. Because everyone's need for for personal vehicles is unlimited, more and more motorbikes or cars are unnecessarily sold, which not only consumes energy to produce but also discharging numerous of garbage from old vehicles. Evidence from surveys and in fact has shown that in " super dumpsites", except domestic waste, most are tires or car bodies. Some argue that railways also produce garbage, not just road. I believe there if no evidence to support that argument cause most part of railways' vehicles are made from alloy and that can be recycled after melting unlike cars or motorcycles, which parts are made from plastic and impossible to be recycled except compressing them into big garbage. The calculating cost from individual vehicles waste indicates undoubtedly that they cost more than investing railways.
In conclusion, the benefit ms of railways are undeniable and the government needs to pay more attention and investment in the railway systems, not only to improve the quality of citizens' life but also make their own country become more civilized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | sakshi111 | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 61
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that art (such as painting and music) does not directly improve quality of people’s life, so the government should spend money on other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...stems rather than roads. In my opinion, i agree with that for the following main ...
^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'magnets'' or 'magnet's'?
Suggestion: magnets'; magnet's
...e subways based on the principle of the magnets propulsion force a few years ago, which...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e on human health and environment. The following reason which made me give ...
^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...e lots of waste. Because everyones need for for personal vehicles is unlimited, more an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, even so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 41.998997996 198% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2989.0 1615.20841683 185% => OK
No of words: 602.0 315.596192385 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96511627907 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95335121839 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57905170744 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 313.0 176.041082164 178% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519933554817 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 945.0 506.74238477 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.124799452 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.956521739 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1739130435 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180408054541 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531641656221 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037449291126 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102003000889 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310014838798 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.