A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu

Essay topics:

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

A segment of society think that exploitation of animals for human purposes is not worthwhile, while other people have opposite views and claim that animals should be utilized to fulfil the individual’s need for food and research. However, I believe that killing innocent animal species for human purposes is an offensive act.
To embark on, nowadays numerous animals are being consumed by people all over the world. For instance- in China, a large proportion of people eat animal based food like cows, sea foods and many more. Despites this ,the skin of animals are being used for making certain leather products, clothes and decorative material. Moreover, in various medical reasrchs, animals are being used to check the effectiveness of particular medicine. For example- majority of experiments are being performed on pigs and rats to assess the causative agent of specific illness and for certain vaccine trials.
However, overuse of animals for individual’s purposes has many adverse consequences. Firstly, consumption of variety of animal species lead to the extinction of the species, as a result disturbing the ecological food chain. Hence, animal predators will not find their preys and consequently, they will attack the humans to fulfil hunger need. Secondly, killing the animals for obtaining flesh , leather is against the nature’s norms. People should look for other resources to satisfying their needs rather than exploiting animals.
To conclude, animals are being exploited for satisfying several human needs , which is outrageous. This can be resolved by limiting the overuse of animals and opting for human based food sources.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-19 mytinh 84 view
2022-12-18 snowacealex 84 view
2022-12-17 Alexspector 56 view
2022-12-17 Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung 73 view
2022-12-06 bapcai 73 view
Essays by user Nancysachdeva :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., sea foods and many more. Despites this ,the skin of animals are being used for m...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l not find their preys and consequently, they will attack the humans to fulfil hu...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... killing the animals for obtaining flesh , leather is against the nature’s norms. ...
^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oited for satisfying several human needs , which is outrageous. This can be resolv...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75289862041 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9520511154 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466355991373 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166353021935 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986090930621 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309476970348 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536916813387 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.