High school students are usually not good at managing money. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
Saving money is an adverse and seemingly unsolvable challenge for high school students today. Adolescents are besieged with the spectre of finance which traces its roots from the deficiency of supervision from adults. This concern could be remedied by proper adjustment in adult’s parenting skills and taking teen life skills lessons.
Dissipation in teenagers is metamorphosing into a severe and seemingly unabated heavy cross to bear for. This headache traces its roots from the lack of care from adults. Many parents give money to their children unconditionally and not control their spendings due to the fact that they think their children are mature enough, even though adolescents are still delinquent. In addition, some families which have the habit of throw money around can pave the way to the children’s squandering as parents’ behaviour influences directly to a child’s mind.
While seemingly insurmountable, this dilemma is not bereft of any reasonable cure and primary of which is the adjustment of parents in teaching and behaving towards the children. Such solution will prevent teenagers from misusing the money which they may learn in their lives afterwards that is very difficult to earn. A further supplement to this cure is the attendance to life skills lessons, as the teenagers not only learn how to economize but also many other useful skills there.
Subsequently weighing all the aforementioned, it is apparent that the dilemma on money wasting is an imminent social ill that could be solved with the stated remedies, which when strictly adhered will render our lives better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-30 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...so many other useful skills there. Subsequently weighing all the aforementioned, it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36078431373 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84014717685 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1967921588 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.272727273 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822544874962 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335701959141 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519698999746 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500045029504 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247179436728 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.