If we want to save the future of the planet, we will have to drastically change our way of life. What is your opinion?
All across the world, people are facing a wealth of new and challenging environmental problems every day. The planet is poised at the brink of a severe environmental crisis. It’s time for people to alter their way of living for the better. As a human being, I would examine the roots of the matter and offer some statements of mine.
To begin with the state of this problem. Global warming has become an undisputed fact about our current livelihoods. It is the result of human practices like emission of Greenhouse gases. The rising temperatures of the oceans and the Earth’s surface causing melting of polar ice caps, rise in sea levels and also unnatural patterns of precipitation such as flash floods, excessive snow or desertification.
Another problem is that human is overcutting the trees in the forest for individual purposes. For instance, Vietnam used to be a place of “silver sea and gold forest” but over the last few years, sparse vegetation gradually. Thus, people here have got many troubles with natural disaster and respiratory diseases. A solution is for the government to provide strict rules and punishments not only to protect the forests but also encourage people planning trees.
In conclusion, current environmental problems make us vulnerable to disasters and tragedies, now and in the future. We are in a state of planetary emergency, with environmental problems piling up high around us. People need to join hand with safeguarding our planet for a brighter future.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004 61
- Sports help to build peace in the world Do you agree or disagree 84
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 11
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The picture below shows the Use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11788617886 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94337295944 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654471544715 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4908825326 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0633852241937 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207877355891 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277509711847 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375227886978 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260641072163 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.