Impact of Cinema in Life
Cinema has evolved a great way as a recreational entertainment platform around the century. It has become one of the most favorite pastimes since its onset. From watching screenings at theatres to television through cable TV, Cinema has evolved. Mobiles and Internet have made cinema access very portable.
Everyone is somehow connected through Cinema. Specific cinema incidences screened on Tv or at the theatres influence our mindset and thought processes. We imagine our life scenarios related to the incidents and scenes from certain cinemas. We even idolize, admire, and adopt certain movie characters.
Additional Cinema has certain lurking dangers in it. It has impacted the working classes, the students, and the laboring sections of the society. Cinema portrays certain dark, undesirable, and vulgar connections that inbreed contaminated thoughts in the community.
Cinema, at times, harms our eyesight and makes us waste our money. It leads the youngsters of today to go astray and inflicts impure thoughts in their minds. Certain cinemas destroy moral values.
Thus, Cinema has a significant influence on society and the lives of people. It influences as well destroys us, but it is in our hands to decide what to and what not to choose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | xxlusubuxx | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | mihir76 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | annaalysia007 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 198.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36868686869 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74560338081 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661616161616 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2379707651 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.4375 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.375 20.7667163134 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 7.06120827912 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305339234266 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872072176693 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533945787298 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144420747147 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469461649921 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.