The increasing housing problem in big cities has social consequences. Some people say that only government can solve this problem.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
is a fact that population density and the increasing number of housing have created some social problems in many large cities. A group of people believe that the issue could only be solved by the government. I personally agree with the statement and the following essay will discuss it in details.
It is true that the increasing population in large cities such as Jakarta, New York or Beijing has created some social issues. Firstly, as the demand for houses in big cities increase, the price of properties has risen by double or triple in the past few years. This situation has affected to the middle and lower income class, as they could not afford to buy houses in the city. Most of them purchase properties in more developed areas of the city and consequently they have to spend more money on transportation to the workplace. Secondly, the high demand of housing areas has created some environment issues. As more houses are built in the cities, the number of parks and trees become lesser and lesser these days. As we all know that trees are beneficial for human beings, as they produce oxygen and absorb pollution. Consequently, air pollution in these cities has become worst than ever these days and the number of people who have respiration problem has increased.
In order to restore these conditions, it is the government task to restructure the city, as they are the one who has the power and the authority. The government should stop giving new permits for city developers. They should expand and develop new areas, therefore some of the city’s people will move to the new area and it will gradually reduce the density problem. And then, the government should set strict regulations about developing new real estates in the city, as there should be a proportionate ratio between building and green areas in the city. With a proportionate number of parks and buildings, it is hoped the city became greener and cleaner.
In conclusion, I agree that it is the government task to solve the social consequences of density issue. As they have the power and the authority to resolve the issue, they should set measurable campaigns and programs to resolve the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-31 | ngo viet | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | lakhveer khokhar | 71 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | lakhveer khokhar | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
- Due to technology mobile phones are disrupting social interactions To what extent you are agree or disagree 11
- In some developing countries it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in developi 78
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree with this opinion 78
- Teaching duscipline is the responsibility of teacher while others are saying this is role of parents Give your opinion 61
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
is a fact that population density and the ...
^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
...ir pollution in these cities has become worst than ever these days and the number of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...expand and develop new areas, therefore some of the city’s people will move to the new area...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87634408602 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64318813547 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486559139785 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.91126288 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248439351816 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764268539707 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597995029809 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153372867356 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508499315736 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.