An increasing number of people are now using dating websites to meet their second halves. Do you think this tendency help people or does more harm than good.
Nowadays, dating websites are on the top in numbers to find their better half. I think this trend is not working forward in a positive way to select the perfect match.
A reason why to avoid a marriage application is the compatibility issue which is actual problems among the youngsters. In this modern world, people should always find the perfect one and after they realised they do not get the best partner to spend their whole life with that person misunderstanding and Quarrels take place. Finally, they get a divorce and it is the big problem why the divorce rate increased in numbers all around the World.
Furthermore, there are high chances of fraud cases. According to one news report they find maximum reports of fraud marriage cases based on survey. Moreover, there are some data leaked issue, teenagers mostly used this dating app. Sometimes the companies sell this user data to the marketing companies for their benefit purpose without concerning the user. For instance, one of my neighbourhood's daughter met one guy on a dating website they got married in a short time of period without understanding and it was not a fact marriage the man only get married because the girl belongs to the high-class family and when the truth comes over every one vision side all the family member shouted on the girl because of a bad decision.
In conclusion, I think modern technology is necessary for developing world but yes, it was not good for the person who searching their life partner in marriage websites because sometimes parents regret with this kind of marriage because of their norms, Rituals and cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-08 | patel_paras7777@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-08 | VIDHI PARMAR | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age group in UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 67
- The Graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 89
- In some countries foreign language is taught at primary school Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The Graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales in 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...think this trend is not working forward in a positive way to select the perfect match. A reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91636363636 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5912758911 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5490325316 49.4020404114 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159004324957 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594554055815 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491916982743 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104688063073 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340039736801 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.