An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What can be done to deal with this situation?
Thanks to globalization, working abroad has hitherto been gaining ground which leads numerous professionals to move out of their home countries to seek work in wealthier nations. This essay will examine a few problems caused by this action and propose some solutions to give more incentives to retain the expert workforce.
The deciding issue involved in letting skilled human resources leave for better careers in other countries is the brain drain. Developing countries undoubtedly have to struggle with the refinement of educational and medical care, to exemplify, when qualified and educated professionals including teachers, lecturers, and doctors seek jobs in richer countries. Experiencing difficulties in the progression of the economy and living conditions will be the eventual outcome. In addition, this movement will certainly create a considerable gap between rich and poor nations around the world. One case in point is that students generally will not be well-prepared for their future if there are no experienced and conscientious professors. Hence, lacking recognition may put an end to compete on a global scale and ultimately sustain a continuous poverty cycle. Aiming to deal with these occurring problems, there are a plethora of possible ways.
To tackle the brain-drain issue, skilled and literate professionals should be secured with a lucrative contract as well as a prosperous working environment. Particularly, improving the welfare system, permitting managerial or supervisory positions, ensuring and investing in state-of-the-art equipment would generate a positive environment where they feel pleasure to be in. Regarding the everlasting global competitions, more tolerance and promising future professions for their certificated experts after they accomplish their training overseas will enhance universally competitive attitudes without doubt. In order to reach these demanding solutions, poorer nations probably need to seek aid from other more developed ones.
On balance, repercussions such as the emigration of skilled persons and international competitiveness loss will just only escalate unless efforts are made to retain specialists in their country of origin. Personally, I support the idea of providing a less stressful environment, appropriate benefits and fairness in the workplace should be thoughtfully put under consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | phuongnhung3107 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Luc1Ferrr | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-24 | Harjeet kaur23 | 82 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | Vicky_2702 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-24 | Mohit Wadhwa | 89 | view |
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 89
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 78
- Gender equality has not been achieved in our society Women still do not have the same rights and opportunities as men To what extend do you agree or disagree 79
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e thoughtfully put under consideration.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, regarding, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90724637681 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27390502402 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686956521739 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6675912315 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.866666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235046146565 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631638334595 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373178226415 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129950364283 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480857849692 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.