Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth. Some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
Recently, the practical implementation of new ideas and introduction new services and techniques has been mainly for the purpose of profit formation. As the inventors main aim is to gain more and more earnings regardless the social impact of their innovation nor its healthy effect. However, in ancient decades, inventors used to create new goods and to develop traditional devices in order to fix environmental issues. Economic circumstances become the main driver behind the transition from ethical aim for new transformation into a cash cow goal. Having said so, variation has two main drivers either profit generation or community development.
Capitalism converted people into consuming society and as a result, creators incredibly developed a wide range of inventions. Do you know the quote of “Brands are the biggest marketing lie made by smart people to steal from the rich”? this is the logical consequence of having an eager community to money, inventors used to developing new goods and creating new techniques with awesome marketing campaigns to achieve their goals of collecting money.
On the other hand, some creators have an effective role in different nations throughout their invented new techniques and products that serve humanity and ease life issues, it could mainly appear in pharmaceutical and medical fields. In addition to most of daily life needs that required to be accomplished efficiently and effectively. Despite the main purpose of previously mentioned inventions is to serve people, thus inventions also are wealth generators.
In my opinion, the primary goal for new innovations is serving mankind, and providing new generations with untraditional instruments to enhance their standards of living. While, earning money could come in the second stage.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper book Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 78
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...y smart people to steal from the rich”? this is the logical consequence of having an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, thus, while, in addition, you know, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03050201271 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644927536232 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0343324413 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0536836659642 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0188093657437 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194241546421 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314996608574 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263697524438 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.