The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.
Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this
technology has been positive.
The online network adequately transformed our lifestyle for the last few years. This essays agree that technological development can give a massive impact for human life, not only helpful but also in a harmful way.
Cyberspace have some advantageous that can help people. Firstly, this network can help people to connect with other person from any different location in an effective and efficient way. There are many different types of social media to communicate with other human-being. You can chat your friend by any messenger application like Whatsapp and line, or seing about their interest in Facebook. Internet also could helping people to improve their skill and learn something new abilities. For instance, lots of teenagers right now improve their language skill from watching Youtube or reading daily blog.
On the other hand, aside from beneficial way, the online network can cause any disadvantageous for our life. Often happened lately, unsocialized person and apathetic. Persons become busier with their smartphone and uncare with their environment. New research suggest U.S adults spend more time interacting with media than ever before. Secondly, extravagant lifestyle and addicted to gadget. Technological improvement facilitate people to buy everything just by a click in their phone. This easiness make people tempted and forget their finance allocation and provoke debt. Tons of people stressed because they can not pay their online shopping debt.
To sum up, inter-connection network have two opposite side for human. It can give us a positive impact and improve our life quality, but also destroy us with the convenience if we can not control ourself
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 84 | view |
- Leisure activities of European adults 53
- the map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 56
- fast food 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000. 67
- Travelling 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmful way" with adverb for "harmful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r human life, not only helpful but also in a harmful way. Cyberspace have some advantageous th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...but also in a harmful way. Cyberspace have some advantageous that can help people....
^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... effective and efficient way. There are many different types of social media to communicate wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...terest in Facebook. Internet also could helping people to improve their skill and learn...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...eir environment. New research suggest U.S adults spend more time interacting with...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40076335878 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77088984732 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652671755725 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3711340788 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6111111111 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5555555556 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0448251708759 0.244688304435 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167114600928 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257385081472 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0326370263298 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133011704405 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.