Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Companies provide employment to the large number of people. The success of any business depends on the quality of the staff so employers conduct the interview to select new workers. Few individuals think that interview is not only a way to appoint somebody on a job. I disagree with the given statement, which says that interview is not a reliable method but there are other better methods also for hiring employee in a company.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons that why interview is being always preferred by the big enterprises; because it is a face-to-face communication where an employer who held the interview and an employee answered the questions regarding to his field. Moreover, a person who is taking the interview can easily judged the personality traits such as skills, confidence, behavior, IQ, self-awareness, self-confidence, attitude and many more. After reviewing the qualities of an interviewee the interviewer put the right person on a right job accordingly to his traits. Big companies like reliance company appointed their workers through taking an interview and accordingly to their studies it is a mention worthy example to cite over here. Hence, this is the main aspect that why interview is being preferred.
Admittedly, if face-to-face talk is not a dependable method to recruit a person on a job then there are multifarious methods which can be used to appoint an individual on a job. Firstly, written test method can be applied by the large companies for recruiting the workers in which multiple choice questions would be given to them for testing their knowledge and capability of understanding. Secondly, assessment centres would be preferred in which the team activities would be done as well as competancy based skills would be judged. It is a good paradigm to mention here is in the field of marketing these tests would be mostly applied in which employee traits can be judged. Ergo, that are some tests which are better than the interview.
From my book of experience, I think so that the face-to-face conversation is better than the other tests which are applied because in an interview a interviewer can easily judged the personal traits of the person whilst through the other tests which are applied a person can only judged about the knowledge of that person in the particular field. If a company applied both of these tests would be too expensive that a company can not conduct these to hire an employee.
In a conclusion, I do not agree with that the interview is not a reliable method while other methods are better. In some situations, conducting interview is more apt and in some situations the other methods may be more advantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-15 | kimvop | 59 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-23 | Shahad jagot | 96 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Harleen kahlon | 82 | view |
- Nowadays children and teenager play more and more computer games Parents think computer games have little value and more harmful effects What s opinion 68
- Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- It is suggested that all young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work, helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the young people? 78
- Most employers nowadays put increasing emphasis on social skills. Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'is' and 'being'.
Suggestion: is always being
...are numerous reasons that why interview is being always preferred by the big enterprises; becau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'judge'
Suggestion: judge
... who is taking the interview can easily judged the personality traits such as skills, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elf-confidence, attitude and many more. After reviewing the qualities of an interview...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ich are applied because in an interview a interviewer can easily judged the perso...
^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'judge'
Suggestion: judge
...n an interview a interviewer can easily judged the personal traits of the person whils...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, i think, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 13.1623246493 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01336302895 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92054289232 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449888641425 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8903020525 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.055555556 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9444444444 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221999139302 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940233692534 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811846551445 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169186855288 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101973748141 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.