Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is irrefutable to say that judging the qualities of employees while hire them are important for the prosperity of company. It is believed by many people that interviews are not a good measure of selecting whom to employ and think that there are other better methods available. I partially agree with the statement I will discuss my viewpoints in my upcoming piece of writing.
To commence with, interviews for hiring staff have a reliable method in many ways. Firstly, confidence and communication skills of a candidate can be recognized by interviews. Secondly, face to face interviews ate helpful for judge the personalities as well as their general knowledge as recruiters can ask them many type of questions by which they can identify the abilities and capabilities of person regarding the job.
However, some other ways of selecting employee are also suitable for the large companies. To be more precise, written test of candidate is one of the better way to checking the theoretical knowledge of candidates. By this they can choose those employees who scored highest in their tests. Moreover, group discussions are another suitable way to recruiting the staff. As a result, it express the real personalities and leadership qualities of the candidates.
To recapitulate, it is clear from the above discussion that interview is a perfect source for selecting staff but at the same time other methods of employee's selection are also effective. Therefore, i think that combination of interviews and other measures are the reliable methods for hiring staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | 1 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | alifarokh | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Harleen kahlon | 82 | view |
| 2021-03-01 | Pamm | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-23 | Shahad jagot | 96 | view |
- The chart shows the results of a survey conducted in the UK in three different years regarding the levels of interest in 6 particular years 78
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the sales of children s books adults fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in UK who use the internet everyday from 2003 2006 92
- Men are placed in most high level job Some people say that the government should encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r hiring staff have a reliable method in many ways. Firstly, confidence and commu...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...al knowledge as recruiters can ask them many type of questions by which they can identify...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'expresses'?
Suggestion: expresses
...o recruiting the staff. As a result, it express the real personalities and leadership q...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...election are also effective. Therefore, i think that combination of interviews an...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i think, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00615687794 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561264822134 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8523369737 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.538461538 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285278911585 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10262671348 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116265380352 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178144661659 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809706279233 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.