It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is generally believed that due to the rapid development of technology, traditions and cultures will be disappeared in a near future; so, technology and traditional cultures cannot exist together. Personally, I strongly disagree with this point of view due to several convincing reasons.
First, in the age of industrialized revolution, modern technology has replaced gradually skilled craftsmen in terms of handicraft manufacture. Mass production in factories has allowed companies to produce millions of traditional stuffs within a few hours, compared to a few weeks or even a month to finish a refined item in the past. For instance, people can easily wear a similar costume of their country produced in a mass-production factory. This would assist the spread of tradition of a nation more rapidly to every corner of the world.
Second, modern technology facilitates the process of regular repair and maintenance of traditional buildings. A wide range of technology machine is employed to assist workers and architects to renovate or do some frequent check to protect these historical buildings which are regarded as a part of heritage of a nation or a local place. This action would represent a combination of the use of modern technology and the value of traditional cultures to promote the beauty of a nation to people all over the world.
In conclusion, even though modern technology could exert some negative effects on the long-term existence of traditional cultures, I still hold a firm belief that these different fields complement each other, which contributes positively to the development of a nation as a whole.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish. 61
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13248866033 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7665458262 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305975838704 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11226303323 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856631118088 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182448619358 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109754234342 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.