It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since time immemorial, human cares as to how to shield endangered animals from extinction are insufficient. I, as a fervent animal protector, censure the multitudes’ nonchalant attitudes towards animal preservation owing to the responsibility of human beings and biodiversity.
Admittedly, the primary reason for protecting rare animals is the vital roles they play in not just the balance of the ecosystem but also in people’s lives. Everything within nature is interconnected, if one animal becomes extinct, the food chain would be disrupted, affecting multitudes of other animals, even plants. For example, black rat snakes are predators of mice and rats, in the interim, they are preys to red-tailed hawks and owls. In a field, the herd of mice is always in control thanks to snakes; however, hunting activity sparking the diminishing number of snakes causes following repercussions on the community. Hawks, as a result, starve to death due to the lack of food while rats wreak havoc on crops, which directly escalates farmers’ tension regarding the deterioration in crop yields. Hence, not only human beings but also the ecosystem is under fierce threats from the utter disappearances of endangered animals since they are a part of nature.
In addition, protecting animals on the verge of extinction is an obvious duty of people based on the immense impact they did. Time has proven the grandiose influence that humans exert on the earth, particularly on animals. To date, the inexorable expansion of human residence, exceptionally for cultivation and settlement, has resulted in the loss of animal habitats for hundreds of years. Illegal hunting as a livelihood is driving a myriad of species to extinction or putting them in great jeopardy. This suggests that humans are held accountable for rectifying the problem and dealing with the consequence.
In conclusion, although humans are not to blame for the extinction of several prehistoric animals, extinction would be their responsibility if they did not shield live species now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The chart below gives information about the prices of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36335403727 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07772122912 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.543127755 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174641679793 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593474726765 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378405402056 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107793519849 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146084195083 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.