Some people believe that extinction of animals is a inevitable event, and there is no reason for people to stop this process. I think they are wrong, and we are responsible to preserve animal from hazard of extinction for some reasons that I will be said in continue.
We should look after animals to prevent the extinction of them, because we are the only genius creator who can conserve environment from hazards and one of this hazards threating our environment is animals extinction. Firstly, most of animal species have existed from years before our creation, and our development is probably the main cause of their extinction. Secondly, their existence is crucial for life consistency, and their absence would have some side effects, which do not know about them. For example, with the absence of some of them, population of harmful insects, causing a variety of illnesses to us , might be increased. Finally, many animals are involved in our food chain, so if one of them be exincted, it would cause a sort of problems in our food production.
We can take a few actions to preserve animals, not charging us too much cost. Governments can easily establish a set of regulations to stop harming animal's existence. For example, governments can put some restrictions on fishing to ban it during their self-production time. Furthermore with social awareness about this issue, many people would find themselves responsible for preserving of animals' existence. Actions such these two items, do not need a magnificent budget, and would not have any disadvanges for society. On the contrary, it makes possible to have a sustainable development, and to save the environment for future people.
Based on reasons mentioned above, I think we should keep animal species safely, and prevent them from being exincted.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Some people think movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e believe that extinction of animals is a inevitable event, and there is no reaso...
^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rve environment from hazards and one of this hazards threating our environment is an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts, causing a variety of illnesses to us , might be increased. Finally, many anima...
^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...n it during their self-production time. Furthermore with social awareness about this issue,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, sort of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8668089851 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5704589379 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241295738891 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886323950473 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841830222578 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177579911017 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747045558906 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.