It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that there are no reasons for us to protect animal species from extinction as it is the outcome of evolution and it even occurs in the absence of human interference. In my opinion, I utterly disagree this statement. It is extremely essential to preserve species on the brink of extinction because of giving rise to disruption of biodiversity balance, and far-reaching consequences for the human race such as storms, flood.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that the extinction of endangered species triggers biodiversity loss. In reality, scientists are attempting to study genetic animals to cure human diseases. As a result, extinction eradicated accidentally this opportunity. A good example of this is polar bears, being on the brink of extinction. Scientists revealed that they have up to 11 centimeters of fat underneath their skin, having no effect on their health. For this reason, scientists are studying genetic polar bears to heal obesity, and diabetes for patients.
In addition, extinction gives rise to profound effects on the human race such as disasters. It is undoubted that in many countries, people wipe out the space of animal species such as deforestation. As a consequence, this results in a lot of problems in terms of the environment, being the main reason leads to disasters like floods, and soil erosion. This can be evidenced by Viet Nam, deforestation is ubiquitous, being the outcome of a flood in 2003.
In conclusion, I completely advocate that we should try to prevent extinction from happening. It causes adverse impacts on inhabitants such as floods, and biodiversity loss.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | roadtoapro | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the figure for international conferences held in three different cities between 1980 and 2010 67
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 73
- Education for young people is important in many countris However the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 61
- The bar shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21132075472 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13311189944 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9539578877 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257594590068 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080495509164 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061146974982 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151440852515 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392205962357 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.