Opinions are divided on whether people ought to travel to different places to learn about the culture or to learn from books, films and the Internet. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the former statement and I will explain why.
Granted, one might claim that online resources are sufficient in learning about a new culture. This is predicated on the assumption that on the Internet, people could observe various points of views about a culture, which is the best method to have an overview of such culture he or she would like to understand. However, this line of reasoning is not sound, since online or book reviews are usually not up to date, thus making these reviews bias. To illustrate, visitors to a third world country like Philippines tend to stay in a luxury hotel and consume the nation’s best cuisine, therefore their experiences of that culture is not realistic. Furthermore, books and the internet only depict the bright side of a culture, and visitors could not study about such culture without first-hand experience.
As for the first-hand experience, if he or she wants to look closer at a newly discovered culture, he or she cannot use second-hand experience as a foundation. For instance, when researching a phenomenon like racism in one culture, people cannot expect a social student who has never visited any country before, talking excessively about how racist people in that culture are. Additionally, information about a culture on the Internet can only be so helpful to a certain extent. In other words, this information only supplements and does not replace what he or she has known about that culture. Take cuisine, for example, people who have not eaten traditional Pho in Viet Nam could not think of its taste and neither read nor listen about it helps.
To conclude, although books and the Internet do benefit people in having an overview of the culture, these cannot replace the pivotal role of travelling in order to truly learn about the culture, since real-life experience cannot be compared to old, inaccurate experiences of others.
- The plan below shows the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year https i0 wp com how2donow com wp content uploads 2021 06 south jpeg w 819 ssl 1 73
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugarcane https i0 wp com howtodoielts com wp content uploads 2021 06 test 2 jpg fit 670 2C784 ssl 1 61
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions https i2 wp com ieltspracticeonline com wp content uploads 2021 05 The charts give information about world forest in five different regions png fit 720 2C439 ssl 1 61
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... old, inaccurate experiences of others.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98847262248 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72229826112 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4424911281 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299325356067 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106088174399 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966823462008 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191986935668 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715416371746 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... old, inaccurate experiences of others.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, thus, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98847262248 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72229826112 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4424911281 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299325356067 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106088174399 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966823462008 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191986935668 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715416371746 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.