It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can learn just as much from books, films and the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the question that whether people should raise their knowledge about various cultures by reading from media service or by visiting other places have been received a great deal of public attention. Although the idea of studying cultures through media service, which permit people to go out, seems attractive, I utterly disagree with this view.
One reason that why physical travel should be appreciated more than study from press is the accuracy of information about cultures. Since when people read book to learn about culture, they just can get information from the perspective of the writer or what the writer can see. Furthermore, if people learn about a particular culture, this means that they taste food, meet people, know history,... of this culture, which people can not do if they just stay at home and read about a culture. As the result, people can not know exactly about cultures if they do not visit other places, so that studying from books, films and the internet should not be considered a potential method to know about cultures.
Another compelling reasons that human should travel to research about cultures is special experience and feeling during journey. Some opponents may say that it is enough to see everything through pictures, but it will be far more significant if people can touch or taste them. For instance, everyone can see Hanbok - traditional clothes of Korean, which is review as one of the most wonderful traditional clothes in the world, but putting on it will be a great experience that no one can deny. In fact, the science proved that memories provided by tactile sense, gustation, hearing will last longer than ones provided by eyesight.
In conclusion, it seems to me that visiting other places is the best approach for people wanting to know more about some cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nguyennhathuy | view | |
| 2023-09-14 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | Manideep Macherla | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ey taste food, meet people, know history,... of this culture, which people can not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04620462046 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52411971093 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551155115512 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7037980698 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260635050799 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935992971373 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604759211587 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144035207274 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675959556172 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.