It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
There has been a matter of concern among people over whether traveling to natural areas which are a far distance from the residential areas, such as the South Pole. In my opinion, while this phenomenon can have some benefits, I believe that its drawbacks are more significant.
In the one hand, the main advantage of traveling to remote natural areas is that individuals can expand their horizon. In fact, instead of going to the familiar places which cannot satisfy the people’s curiosity, not only can having a trip to some isolated places gain unforgettable memories but it may also contain numerous amount of knowledge which has never been experienced before. For example, the South Pole, which is the main habitat of penguins, is an ideal site for scientists to do researches on this creature in particular and other environmental aspects in general.
In the other hand, I believe that this development may result in negative development for humans. Firstly, going to remote areas can pose many considerable threats to travelers’ health due to the lack of geographical as well as biological knowledge about these destinations. For instance, visitors who go to the South Pole may not be aware of the severe weather condition, whose temperature can exceed the endurance of a typical person. Secondly, since modern facilities and transportation are required to secure people against dangerous situations, the trip to an isolated environment may cost a huge amount of money. Therefore, these costly trips which can only be afforded by a small group of rich tourists and scientists are limited to approach the middle-class.
In conclusion, while some advocates think that traveling to undiscovered natural environments can have some advantage, I believe that this tendency is much more disadvantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Saeedeamani | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | mayankmm | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | dqhungdl | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | dqhungdl | 67 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on of the treatment of those who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on of the treatment of those who are already ill.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t individuals can expand their horizon. In details, instead of going to the famili...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27184466019 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05347994944 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.534353818 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392749444394 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156843980622 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171596166324 0.0667982634062 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29138816704 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.303612839136 0.056905535591 534% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.