It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that countries should minimize food imports and prioritize achieving food self-sufficiency instead. In my opinion, I disagree with this notion because I believe that self-production and import should be pursued simultaneously.
Those who believe that people should be entirely supplied with domestic food may point to food independence and employability. It is true that not relying on other supply sources from other countries can alleviate the concern of the authorities about prices and the global food situation. Besides, the expansion of this area can generate many potential jobs for local residents because self-production requires the involvement of a huge workforce for its complicated procedures. However, I think these are short-term advantages while in the long term, the government may face challenges when the population grows dramatically, the natural resources run out, and the future generation does not favor working in this field.
In my view, countries should not only produce food but also import it in an appropriate quantity for the diversity of supply chains and economic efficiency. Regarding the former, food import restrictions can impose pressure on the government when that country is confronted with food shortages derived from harsh conditions and inferior technology, which could be addressed by importation. In terms of economic perspective, food self-producing is not always more economical than buying it abroad if they do not have favorable conditions. For instance, if the government invests in agriculture regardless of the common extreme weather conditions, they are likely to waste as the crops may be devastated by several yearly storms. Instead, they should finance their advantageous sectors to produce lucrative products and export to the international market for profit enhancement.
In conclusion, while I understand why people advocate the notion that countries should produce all food for their population and limit imports, I believe that importation and self-reliance should be utilized to solve food shortages and boost economic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-01 | ng duc minh | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | Koi | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 89
- Some people think that pp should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job What other factors should be considered 73
- Pollution of rivers lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment What are the possible causes of water pollution and what effects does this have on animal life and human society 84
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject What are causes And what will be effects on society 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71518987342 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17913099737 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6446376577 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271780584261 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105959931855 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708113426702 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188576649595 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06324274756 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.