It is true to say that many industrialized nations allocate a great number of their health funds to purchase state of the art medical instruments.
It is true to say that many industrialized nations allocate a great number of their health funds to purchase state of the art medical instruments. In such a context, it is asserted that this budget should be devoted to health education programs. I acknowledge that spending money on health education is of paramount importance, however, buying modern and expensive medical devices is important as well and need enough budget.
In the new millennium, health planners have decided to equip the hospitals and care centers with diverse medical technologies which some times can cost an arm and a leg. It is unequivocal to say that equipping health centers with modern technologies can bring tangible benefits not only for the patients but also for the hospitals. As a case in point, some diseases involving lung and prostate cancer, cardiovascular diseases and etc. need permanent checkup by efficient and precise medical technologies to treat completely. In other words, these patients can not cure their illness without utilizing these technologies.
On the other hand, there should be enough budget devoted to health education in order to maintain people health throughout their life span. Some special programs should be devised to raise awareness of all citizens irrespective of their age and gender which need huge funds in the long run. Besides, some preventive tactics should be taken into account by local authorities and individuals to guarantee better health. For example, having nutritious and healthy meals could contribute to a far better health condition in all members of society and this idea need money to be promoted.
To sum up, I am inclined to aver that the health budget should be spent sagaciously to afford medical technologies and improve health education in the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- The illustration demonstrates the proportion of graduates unable to find an appropriate occupation in a specific European nation over the course of a two year. 78
- Some people support the idea of imposing taxes on fossil fuels ( oil, coal, and gas) in order to reduce energy consumption. Others disagree with this approach.Consider the debate and its arguments, and come to your own conclusion. 78
- The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years. 56
- It is true to say that in the new millennium people pay too much attention to monetary things 89
- It is claimed that living in a foreign nation who have different language could lead to devastating social and practical problems. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...rostate cancer, cardiovascular diseases and etc. need permanent checkup by efficient and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in other words, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25347222222 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84332176941 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2717475251 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.384615385 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304279524276 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123931593244 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.25412328921 0.0667982634062 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194585398694 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182990649217 0.056905535591 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.