Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today.
How important are presentation and public speaking skills, compared with various other work skills?
Which skill is the most important ability for most people these days?
In the competitive work scene of modern times, a range of skills is desired for the best performance. Among these, the ability to deliver a group presentation has been considered by some people as the most crucial. While this particular skill is useful, I would argue that there is a more vital ability, which is multiple-levelled management.
Certain workplaces indeed highlight the task of presenting and speaking in public. Understandably, the skill is important for working individuals to convey clear summarized information or convince their audience to subscribe to their ideas. This not only facilitates overall work progress but also increase work prospects for those who can impress. Examples for this are relatively wide-ranging, encompassing both regular reports in weekly meetings by employees and inspiring goal-setting speeches by leaders. In spite of the aforementioned ideas, making a group presentation plays more of a supplementary role and is increasingly replaceable with online reports and personnel outsourcing to motivating speakers outside.
On the other hand, mastering techniques of management to varying effects is arguably the most desired skill. To begin with, self-management at work is fundamental for individual professional growth and also the source of intrinsic motivation. For instance, if workers can plan and monitor their own work progress, they have better orientation and can troubleshoot issues that hinder their work, which is crucial to remove these impediments. Furthermore, team management is key to the success of collaborative projects. Effective team leaders, for instance, are capable of not only regulating their own work responsibilities but also assigning tasks to able team members, ensuring project completion consequentially.
Stemming from the arguments above, I conclude that even though the skill of presenting and public speaking has its value, it is not as important as the ability to manage, which is indispensable not only for personal growth but also team progress.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-15 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
2021-06-16 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 92
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66993464052 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32439047721 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9845384257 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372320727593 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114638825382 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612001353888 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223766319664 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279046290968 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.