Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
Nowadays, the globe are flooded with advent technologies. A recent few decade are witness of development in technology sector amid this development. There is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon, technology has made life convenient and reliable for all generation. Despite from that it has great negative impacts. I will try to throw light upon the view of technology make life easy. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To embark on, there are multifarious reason to shore those people who are in favor of advantages of technology. To be started with, the dominant affection of technology is that people today can aware of all technology that are invented in the world. For instance, invention of mobile phone is more beneficial for people likewise people can interact with other through this technology and doing video call to make relationship strong. In additional, people may use the internet which is an extremely great exploration of the world where all one can search all the information or history of any nation. Despite of having this advent, some other discovery like bulb and television which bring brightness in the world and in the life respectively. The another reason that has associated with it is people have used this technology behalf of relief the stress and feel relax.
Furthermore, technology has brought more importance in education sector while people are motivation to improve the technology to make flexible life in nearby future.
On the other side of spectrum, there are several demerits of technology. Firstly, people are more likely to addict to technology such as mobile phone. Whether people have suffered from some hazardous diseases like obesity or physical problem. Because people find it easier to connect with others and they would less feasible to interact with relatives and this may led to isolate by themselves. Another predominant reason is, well-educated people are migrated by creative ideas due to encourage from practical or technical knowledge. Hence, they moved to another countries to obtain more knowledge about it. Consequently, they stay there for long time rather back to native nation or develop the technology at indigenous places.
Aggelomerating, all the points I elaborated an above that can be concluded that exploration of technology led to great future among. Young generation. Not only at education sector but also it helps to determinate criminal with having camera on roads or lie detector at police station that is why, I support that declaration of life has become more comfortable after growing in technology. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | Thuy Pham | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Thuy Pham | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | BASEM MOHAMED | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | MO86 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | anhminhdec | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 84
- If a product is sold and people buy it, then advertising is not necessary and can be considered a kind of entertainment. Do you agree or disagree with this? 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s associated with it is people have used this technology behalf of relief the str...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22558139535 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994929882 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6643939285 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877846296711 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260674027493 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319870039215 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611915779859 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275454068222 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.