Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Recently, the issue of living abroad has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that residing in a nation where a foreign language is spoken can lead to practical and social problems, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from residing overseas. Perhaps the principal benefit is that people can have a chance to acquire a language other than their mother tongue considering that they are always exposed to an environment where they have to speak in a foreign language. In addition, those who have experience of dwelling in an overseas country with language skills are more likely to find a multitude of well-paying and prestigious employment opportunities because they are able to compete with monolingual counterparts in the job market with greater ease. To exemplify, the majority of international companies in South Korea have a predisposition to hire employees proficient in a second language since a huge amount of their business revolves around global trading. Thus, multilingual workers are needed in order to deal with a multitude of issues related to their work.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that living in a foreign country merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that the language barrier prevents people who are not fluent in a language apart from their own language from communicating with speakers of a foreign language, which often leads to misunderstandings and could even result in cultural conflicts. Furthermore, being forced to speak in a second language could cause people to suffer from dealing with their small tasks that seem to be insurmountable, including doctors' appointments and going shopping, exerting a negative influence on the quality of their life. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
- QQQQQQQ1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Q2 Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draw the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q1515 Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22309711286 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95504956119 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.585984249 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209535167614 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612378074916 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475970158622 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1153915036 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351271870681 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.