Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology repair their function. Do you agree or disagree?
With the help of internet, the level of libraries are being demolished by leaps and bounds. Since technology has been rising in terms of obtaining knowledge regarding to study. However, I still consider to libraries as a precious domain in order to get education instead of internet.
Commencing with the most salient reason why I behalf of libraries. First and predominant is that authentic information. In other words, everyone knows that books are written by experts, who have omniscient knowledge of their subject. Although internet is known as a one of the best source in order to enhance knowledge, the real reliability is very hard to figure out on internet. This might be because, internet is not bound for anyone, so people may keep in touch with unusual studies, which is put very deterimental effect on education. Meanwhile, offline education sources bestow peaceful atmosphere or help in the way of concentrating on learning. Whenever people receive education from internet that time they cannot spend quality time on their study because they are frequently disturbed via other sources whether multimedia or social media. As a result, not only the government, but people should also give priority to maintain libraries instead of demolishing offline education sources.
In addition to this, most of the senior citizens do not know how to utilize internet in order to obtain knowledge. To explain it, usually grey hair people are not familiar with advanced technology. Due to this,they gravitate toward libraries. As they can easily access to books from libraries without confronting any miner hurdle. Consequently, libraries can prove as a boon for sinior citizens.
In conclusion, as most important thing is that getting knowledge, whether internet or libraries, whilst on internet people cannot sure neither the authencity of books nor the reliability. So, government should funds on maintaining public libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-25 | Ranjeet brar | 95 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and tracks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles wist be passenger Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The international news is a source of knowledge about the world How far can journalists be trusted What are the qualities of a good journalist 87
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology repair their function Do you agree or disagree 95
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e being demolished by leaps and bounds. Since technology has been rising in terms of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...ar with advanced technology. Due to this,they gravitate toward libraries. As they can...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o this,they gravitate toward libraries. As they can easily access to books from li...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, may, regarding, so, still, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35197368421 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87425280848 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7295631279 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3888888889 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092582070209 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030692392374 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338752092489 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624695908502 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222764190382 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.