In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new houses Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas Do the advanta

It is true that there is minimal restriction over the design and construction of new residences in many cities. While some people might choose to create their house in their own ideas rather than building them in the same style as the existing buildings in their neighborhoods, I would argue that this trend could bring about enormous changes to society.
On the one hand, Building a house might be a once-in-a-lifetime event, so it's logical to plan it in a personalized way, and there are indisputable benefits. First, it introduces a fresh breeze to the atmosphere, bringing more vibrant color to the scene and allowing the project to stand out among others. Moreover, unlike other necessities such as healthcare or education, the nonuniformity of a residential neighborhood is not as crucial.
On the other hand, I would not consider a magnificent region if the construction were erected without concern for the natural surroundings. Different housing types coexisting in one location might be an architectural disaster rather than a desirable innovation. Ha Noi is a primary example; for years, unattractive buildings that are not in harmony with the city's other structures have been created, leaving the old areas of the city mingled with the messy brick houses and skyscrapers.
To summarize, while some argue that the design and construction of contemporary and traditional structures should be identical, I believe that allowing homeowners to design their homes according to their own preferences would provide greater benefits.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a personalized way" with adverb for "personalized"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...fetime event, so its logical to plan it in a personalized way, and there are indisputable benefits. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, while, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17515846564 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614754098361 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1231869792 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.444444444 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331553327087 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104087089987 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099556932584 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178404213659 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114593694781 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.