The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of charitable activities among people of various ages in the United Kingdom.
Looking at the chart, it is readily apparent that there was a higher trend of Britain donated to charity in 1990 than 2010. Nevertheless, this pattern alters between the two categories of above the age of 50. It is also of note that the highest figure can be observed in the 36-50 group age, whereas, the lowest percentage came from that of 18-25.
As it can be clearly seen, in 1990, about 42% of those aged 30 to 50 gave away money to charitable organizations, which was the highest data on the list. Nonetheless, the 18-25 age group contributed the least, accounting for only 17% of the total. By 2010, these proportion hit a bottom at around 7%, while that of 26-35 age range saw a minimal drop (from 31% to 24%).
On the other hand, both donations from those above the age of 50 and 65 experienced a small increase, from 35% to almost 40% and from around 33% to 35% respectively. While there was a downward trend in the percentage of British people giving money to charity by 36-50 age range by 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-10 | kavi jk | 59 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-06 | MiaPhan_09 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Simon31 | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | kevann | 73 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 78
- 3 These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negatives development 73
- Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- 3 These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negatives development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the chart, it is readily apparent that there was a higher trend of Britain dona...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e above the age of 50 and 65 experienced a small increase, from 35% to almost 40%...
^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd from around 33% to 35% respectively. While there was a downward trend in the perce...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56157635468 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6004160446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5960591133 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6491429245 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189319493825 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857660251446 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769279778153 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114999853592 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254073115071 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.