Many companies sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves. Some people think that it is good thing, while others think that it has disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Being a patron of sports is a great way for a lot of firms to promote themselves in the market. However, while this is a benificial thing to make a company well-known. It is argue that this method can be a firm’s drawback for the future. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
Spreading their firm’s name in sport is a great way to make people acknowledge them, gather more customers and that is benefit for them. So, if customers buy their products, it will make a large revenue for the firm and attract more attention. Additionally, because of their revenue, they can make their stock price higher and earn more money in the future. Furthermore, they can get many patrons for their firms and improve the companies’ reputation. For instance, Pepsi raised their revenue by 10% and their stock price by 5% in just two years after they promoted themselves in a football game.
On the other hand, products that have errors which are used in big games for the advertisement of companies could be a downside that many people believe in. It may deflect the attention of people from sports to their products. In addition, when defected products appeared, they may influence the outcome of games. For example, a player is about to score for his team, slip while running because shoes’ sole fall off, and cause their team to lose the game. Furthermore, because of defected products, their firms would become bad in the eyes of their customers and they might lose their reputation.
In conclusion, even though company’s advertisements cause losing focus in sport games may displease their potential customers, it is certain that sports events are promoted greatly while sports games are held, and it makes profit for firms to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | tienbk95 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | tungnguyen3112 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends whereas now many suffer loneliness and health problems What are the causes of this and what are some solutions 59
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this? What measures can the international community take to meet this demand? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...ing to make a company well-known. It is argue that this method can be a firm's d...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and they might lose their reputation. In conclusion, even though company'...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97324414716 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71141973139 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528428093645 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8071837746 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112258131605 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474805547558 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481352061833 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869691611336 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321597368818 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.