In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, many people who inhabit in urban areas intend to move to cities because of advanced medical resources and excellent education environments. In order to eliminate the gap between cities and urban areas, someone argues that young teachers and doctors should be assigned to rural areas, while others complaint that deciding workplaces is every individuals’ free, it may violate people's free. Both comments have sound reasons that deserve in-depth discussion.
In some poor areas, people have no opportunity to acquire great education and medical care. Hence, illiteracy and illness separate comprehensively and easily in these regions. To ameliorate these problems and improve quality of countries, young teachers and paramedics should work in these place after they just graduate from schools or finish profession training. On the other hand, serving in poor and remote areas not only enhance the characteristic of whole districts but also bring precious knowledge to them, which is quite helpful for their careers.
However, choosing workplaces is every single person’s authorities. If distributing young teachers and doctors to remote areas without their willingness, it may violate their freedom and rights as well as enthusiasm. Otherwise, their awkward skills may bring more serious problems and inhabitants seem to be regard as test samples to practice their skills. As a result, to protect authority of both sides, veterans are the most suitable people to work in these areas rather than rookies.
In my opinion, the government has the vast majority in this issue, they must pay more attention on rural regions and provide more resources to attract more outstanding instructors and doctors to work there. In addition, building progressive facilities is another priority things to boost quality of remote areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | lauranguyen_97 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Hemavathi | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and giv 78
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55160142349 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82848981003 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637010676157 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0440383134 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23740725105 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652455233586 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493268748873 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126998207222 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398839701753 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.