In many countries, the number of animals and plants is declining.
Why do you think this is happening? How can this issue be solved?
Today, many nations are facing some problems with the extinction of some animal and plant species. While direct exploitation of biodiversity and global urbanization are the driving factors, some measures can be taken to solve, or at least alleviate, this issue.
Regarding the reasons for such biodiversity loss, I think taking advantage of the natural environment for various purposes stands first. To be precise, in some countries, enough strict laws have not been introduced to stop poachers from hunting animals illegally, thereby resulting in the complete eradication of some creatures. Another driving force might have to do with urbanization. This is because nowadays, forests and some isolated areas, which can be a natural habitat for some unique flora and fauna, are being cleared excessively to expand cities and towns by many businesspeople. This, in turn, is taking its toll by causing a decline in the number of both common and less common plant species.
Nevertheless, there are several ways in which this situation can be mitigated to some extent. Firstly, stringent regulation should be put into practice by those countries where poaching is freely available. If such penalties as heavy fines or even life-long imprisonment for poaching are implemented, people can be deterred from wildlife crime. Secondly, governments should take on the responsibility of reducing urbanization on a global scale. Instead, they can convert existing buildings in urban areas into high-rise structures to accommodate an increasing population. As a result, the remaining plant and animal species in our ecosystem can be rescued.
To conclude, even though unlawful hunting, and increasing numbers of cities can be the main causes of a decrease in the number of plants and animals in some parts of the world, the implementation of strict policies, and diminishing urbanization levels can help to decelerate this growing trend.
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- The Internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the Internet and what solutions can you suggest 92
- The growth of online courses will one day lead to all universities closing To what extent do you agree 67
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve, or at least alleviate, this issue. Regarding the reasons for such biodivers...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... common and less common plant species. Nevertheless, there are several ways in ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecies in our ecosystem can be rescued. To conclude, even though unlawful huntin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, at least, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99221211369 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5062354953 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293913082586 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957084059652 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640457193208 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184922115207 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229311352241 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.