In many countries, the number of animals and plants is declining. Why do you think this is happening? How can this issue be solved?
In this modern era, there has been an alarming concern that numerous creatures are on the brink of extinction. There are several justifications leading to this tendency, and I believe that the governments and individuals can take viable approaches to this problem.
It is beyond doubt that environment pollution and human overexploitation are the chief culprits of species extinction. Evidently, in terms of water contamination, due to excessive amount of sewage and plastic packaging disposed from factories, a plethora of marine creatures have taken in indigestible components. In fact, a recent survey has indicated that plastic and toxic chemicals have entered the food chain, leading to the decline in the number of animals and plants. Additionally, soil degradation and climate change are contributory factors to extinction as the species can not adapt quickly to the increasing temperature and the desertification process. Moreover, poaching also exerts devastating impacts on the biodiversity. There is a fallacy that some particular herbs and creatures namely rhino can be used as medical treatment; thus, illegal hunting occured.
Albeit the underlying causes, there are feasible measures that the governments and individuals can take to address the predicament. Undoubtedly, only by introducing harsher punishment can the authorities mitigate the creatures’ fatality as hunters and businesses will be discouraged to spoil the nature . Take some developed nations as examples, by restrictions on commodities made from endangered species, they have reduced considerably the number of poachers. Furthermore, both people and governments should jointly shoulder the responsibility for environment protection. From the individuals’ perspective, they can engage in green activities such as beach or forest cleaning and raise awareness of others. Should the environment is clean, the animals and plants will no longer suffer from inadequate food and water supply.
In conclusion, contamination and overexploitation from human are the major reasons for endangered animals and plants, and there are numerous workable approaches to the concerning predicament.
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 11
- Some think that governments should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... will be discouraged to spoil the nature . Take some developed nations as examples...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86075949367 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34522024126 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9891485951 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.466666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15138833614 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443172092123 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426538253015 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882250911816 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492393483176 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.