In many countries, people like to eat a wider range of food than can be grown in their local place. Therefore, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages?
It is agrued that in many nations, individuals enioy to try a wider range of food than can be developed in their local place. Therefore, various of the food citizens eat today has to come from other regions. From my point of view, this phenomenon has both benefits and drawback with each person and each situation. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that the requirement of people have been increased graduately, so diversity production is hugely significant for the population life. Not only does this trend provide numerous good quality food which improve the mentality and productivity of individuals, but also social experience, valuable information and interesting knowledge can be passed on by the other local individuals. Furthermore, more relationship will be created such as local speaker who will have various helpful for the occupation of some postgraduates. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Romanno Wax, The famous scientist and professor which was about the success of europian countries which have right import plans. The statistic showed that nearly every nation has got a plenty of achievement in their development.
On ther other hand, we can not negate the demerit of this problem for the society. If teenagers concentrated too much on other local food, the traditional production will be forgot by adolesence which reduce their economic background and also socioeconomic can be wided where just wealthy individuals can approach the expensive things. Moreover, governments can take advantage for the investment for their own revenue, harmful influence will be led by this action to the young generations.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that this statement have its own strength and weakness for the people life, so the state need to have clear plans to advance their citizens for the nation development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Anhhhhhh | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 39
- The most essential component of a person s life is his or her time at the workplace and life turns meaningless once no job satisfaction is obtained To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of achievement in their development. On ther other hand, we can not negate th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this action to the young generations. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25961538462 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9149103616 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599358974359 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5892026153 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2976610234 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101633124788 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934229787895 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178433858562 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101461590739 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.