Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is this the case? What can be done to attract local people?
Museums and historical sites play a crucial role in educating individuals about the past and cultural heritage. However, nowadays, visiting these places is increasingly more common for tourists than domestic people. There are many reasons behind this phenomenon and I believe that there are several solutions to make local people interested in visiting these places.
There are three main reasons why tourists tend to outnumber residents in their visits to museums and historical sites. Firstly, tourists, especially history lovers want to know the past of countries they visit. In contrast, local people may have a certain amount of knowledge about their nation's past, so they do not need to visit museums and historical sites. Secondly, language problem makes it difficult for local people to visit these places where there are too many foreign tourists. Local people may feel shy if they cannot communicate with foreigners. Ultimately museums and historical sites are mainly used for tourism; therefore, the cost of visiting museums and historical sites is so expensive, and it is not easy for local people to visit these places because of their low budget.
To enhance the appeal of museums and historical sites among residents, several measures can be implemented. To begin with, offering discounts or complimentary entry to museums can attract more local individuals to visit these sites. Furthermore, museums can provide language translation headsets for both local people and international tourists. As a result, local individuals and foreign tourists can share their knowledge about history without having any language barrier. Local people can instruct tourists about their nation’s past and cultural heritage because they have a large amount of knowledge about the place they live best.
In conclusion, residents rarely visit to museums and historical sites because of the language barrier and cost of visit. However, museums can offer discounts and language translation headsets to attract more local individuals.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 73
- The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...many reasons behind this phenomenon and I believe that there are several solution...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53054662379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69196172205 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48231511254 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5157865427 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470388777573 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169509053618 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655103160831 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305131332439 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060036698223 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.