In many parts of the world, some famous people are considered ‘role models', and they are having an increasing influence on the young. Is this a positive or negative development?
In the temporary world, most young generations are increasingly affected by celebrities (KOL, KOC, singer, etc.), and famous individuals would be “role model” in recent future. This curriculum also has positive and negative effects for young people. This essay will be discussing both sides within my explanation.
On the one hand, there is a major reason that famous individuals would be affected positively. In modern society, with many devices’ growth at high level, fewer people get on the internet to earn money, because they only become popular which means they can earn a lot of money there. When this thing becomes more popular, then various person always holding self-phone to do (livestream, record video review about food, clothes, store, etc.). As a result, that makes the young have influenced by them, can be considering the store that reviewer used to review before they go there to buy or eat somethings. Then, thanks to celebrities, the economics of the country is increasing.
On the other hand, young generations will be affected positively, nor they may be affected negatively from ideal model celebrities on the internet. Nowadays, youth aways put their eyes on self-phone screens, who can easily watch a lot of things in it. For instance, a lot of people thanks to the famous to get in the social media platform (YouTube, TikTok, Facebook) to participate and propagandize by showing drawbacks of victim. Based on those disadvantages their fans will believe and run to attack the victim of their idol. But also make the victim scaring not only thinking bad things or becoming patients.
In conclusion, young people in society now are getting on the internet and increasing the number of fans of some celebrities without understanding their content, this thing influences in some of the young. As a result, depend on teenagers to select the content watching, which means if that thing is well they can receive a good lesson, by contrast.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | oanhlilies | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | reverjae | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 70 | view |
- some people work for the same organizations all their working life others believe it is better for work different organisations discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram below shows how recycled paper is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only subjects they find interesting and they are the best at Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only subjects they find interesting and they are the best at Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o review about food, clothes, store, etc.. As a result, that makes the young have ...
^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...their content, this thing influences in some of the young. As a result, depend on teenagers...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09627329193 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74334720001 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4882302906 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267643628792 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751884733922 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750766860732 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161087944634 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586891989322 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...o review about food, clothes, store, etc.. As a result, that makes the young have ...
^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...their content, this thing influences in some of the young. As a result, depend on teenagers...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09627329193 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74334720001 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4882302906 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267643628792 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751884733922 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750766860732 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161087944634 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586891989322 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.