Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Other think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent decades, whether high schools should be given opportunities to evaluate as well as criticize their educationalists has involved a widespread concern. While a school of thought believes that disrespect and indiscipline are an avoidable outcome of this approach. However, I would contend it would result in increased educational quality.
On the one hand, it is possible that expressing thoughts and feelings towards teachers can enhance educational quality. To be more specific, high school students who enroll in universities shortly may cultivate practical skills, such as public speaking skills and interpersonal skills. Furthermore, exchanging ideas and having open discussions between teachers and middle students are considered a vital contributor to creating interactive lessons and two-way communications.
On the other hand, there is a common assumption that high school students have enough ability to utilize their right to promote the educational system without long-term negative consequences. The minority of them who forget to do homework or ignore the lessons of teachers may be reliant on a right of criticizing teachers as a justification for troubles that came from the lack of responsibility of every single student.
Finally, it is irrefutable that enabling students to judge their teachers may undermine students’ sense of respect and discipline. This problem can be ascribed to the lack of immaturity among general students. Notwithstanding, I subscribe to give the freedom of sharing thoughts to learners, which can be the most effective methodology in imparting knowledge. Thanks to this, teachers have a chance to better their pedagogical skills by receiving feedback from students. In this way, both the learners and the educators can achieve higher academically.
In conclusion, learning from others is a popular trend in this day and age, and scores of merits from it will heighten the horizon of high schoolers and educators. The governments should enact the laws of devoting state budgets to support students with cutting-edge infrastructures and educationalists by raising their salaries annually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe the government is responsible for while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people say that art painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sult in increased educational quality. On the one hand, it is possible that exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve lessons and two-way communications. On the other hand, there is a common ass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esponsibility of every single student. Finally, it is irrefutable that enabling...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ators can achieve higher academically. In conclusion, learning from others is a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66770186335 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24873963982 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605590062112 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3934930167 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211867733965 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649838312266 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383328773721 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111742338408 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022698157761 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.