Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
You should write at least 250 words.
In the light of globalization, it is tremendously crucial for a country to thrive in its own economy. This can be addressed by an eclectic mix of solutions related to production and the consumption of both local and alien inhabitants. With that given, a number of people reckon that the key method to develop a country is to increase the number of materials and goods. While this is feasible to some certain extent due to its perks but it remains an irrefutable fact that this also possesses some drawbacks which may make it be a not-suggested idea, I personally disagree with this view.
As a matter of fact, the finance of a nation which will act as a precursor to a successful country relies heavily on exporting goods. This can be attributed to the fact that the amount of materials produced is proportional to the revenue of a country, the more that country sells the more income it will likely to earn. In addition, if this is associated with wise instructions the economy should be able to thrive exponentially. While this is a concrete benefit for both alien consumers and the state of the economy itself, the puzzle of whether it will help the local consumer or not remains arguable.
On the other hand of the idea, this way of development can possibly be counter-productive to the inner-citizen. Constant production of groceries can lead to the unnecessity of the products which can be referred as redundant. For example, subsidizing too much on one certain field of production can lead to a boom of goods which will subsequently undermine the value of the mentioned subject. With that said, the authorities should consider other targets and consider developing a country as a multi-faced problem. Monetary struggles isn't the only kind of hardships that a country may face as there is a plethora of it such as famine, pollutions or flooding. This is why instead of attempting to solve all the struggles at once, the government should remedy them solely.
It is undeniable that continuously producing materials can be beneficial to a country in some specific circumstances. But this is certainly not an appropriate goal as it is not the cure for all problems a country is undergoing. From my point of view, the nation should consider many aspects of a country to point out a more accurate goal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | RkmsU | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | sonicmaster | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | VuTungSon | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...nd of the idea, this way of development can possibly be counter-productive to the inner-citi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...multi-faced problem. Monetary struggles isnt the only kind of hardships that a count...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84090909091 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03547853488 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487373737374 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8099895084 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.764705882 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224125146837 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732212017778 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444837991894 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146788899258 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059196760026 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.