Many people believe that petrol price should be increased in order to direct traffic and pollution. Do you agree
In the wake of social developement, green issues have become more serious than ever. Therefore, whether should the government raise the tax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate conversation. My view is that the gas cost should definitely be elevated.
It is irrefutable that an enormous number of vehicles on the road is the main reason which cause traffic congestion as well as pollution. In this regards, a huge amount of emission and toxic gas that comes from these automobiles could worsen environmental situations. Therefore, if the government increase the affordable price of petrol, there would be less frequently used means of transport and solving the problems also. Furthermore, in many countries, the taxes on personal car owners have decrease, which leads to the bombing of vegicles in inner cities. To illustrate, in 2015 in Vietnam, the cars taxes have gone down to 0% and the traffic jams have happend more regularly since then. Thus, the idea that the authorities increase slightly gas taxes should be launched as soon as possible.
Despite its obvious benefits, raising petrol prices also poses threats in varied level. Particulary, those whose works depend mostly on cars like drivers, of course would confront massive spending on gasoline. Not to mention that those working as drivers could be breadwinner and must raise family as a whole. Nevertheless, day-to-day life may probably be adjusted.
In conclusion, it can be said that lifting the gasoline price would redirect the situation of traffic-load and air quality. By doing so, we firmly sure that we and the next generation will no longer suffer from serious congestion and pollution.
- education should support society. Other believe that education should work for individual. Discuss both view 84
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students how to judge right and wrong and how to behave well. Some say that teachers should only teach students about academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people believe that petrol price should be increased in order to direct traffic and pollution. Do you agree 78
- Whether dangerous sports should be banned. Discuss both view. 89
- We should keep historical buildings. Do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...ax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debate conversation. My view is that the gas c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...fic congestion as well as pollution. In this regards, a huge amount of emission and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s of transport and solving the problems also. Furthermore, in many countries, the ta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79673832208 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643382352941 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9136764568 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218275229219 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631302191182 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457317301132 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117660802016 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336002946371 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.