Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.
What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ?
It is believed that the gap between the rich and the poor have been becoming wider. This situation have been causing many problems not only in the developing countries but also in the wealthy nations. And there are some solutions that can be carried to tackle those problems as well.
The first consequences caused by global rich-poor gap widening is the acceleration of crime rates in society. When individuals who are extremely poor fail to cover their basic needs in life, such as shelters and food, they are usually forced to commit crimes such as burglaries or robberies to have sufficient money in order to support themselves and their families. When this situation becomes worse, it leads to social unrest and political instability. The second problems brought about by economic inequality is the unfairness for people living below the poverty line. For example, while young people coming from a prosperous family often easily have a chance to study abroad at leading universities in the world, many poor ones almost can not access the average quality education in their own countries. As a result, good education opportunities turn out to be a luxury thing which only the wealthy can afford.
To address above problems, firstly, governments should provide financial and job opportunity supports for impoverished people. It will allow them to increase their living standards, provides them a chance to make a living by themselves and prevents them from becoming criminals. This measure would be financed by imposing more tax on the rich. Secondly, it is necessary for the government to offer special educational opportunities such as full scholarships to students who have poverty-stricken backgrounds, which would enable them to continue their studies even when their parents could not pay for their tuition fees. When the youth in need are well-educated, their are more likely to find good jobs and escape the cycle of poverty. The burden on society would be minimized as the unemployment rate is reduced and the rich-poor gap is narrowed.
In conclusion, the economic inequality is widening in many countries by many reasons, but by finding the main issues and tackle them, governments could diminish the gap between rich and poor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | Gagan Cheema | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | buihonghai | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | buihonghai | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | HaiTrieuIELTS | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | HaiTrieuIELTS | 56 | view |
- It is difficult for people in the cities getting enough physical exercise What are the causes and solutions 76
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Young people from rich countries are spending time for unpaid works in poor countries. Why ? Who benefit more, young peole or poor countries ? 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...en the youth in need are well-educated, their are more likely to find good jobs and e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18956043956 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80241730448 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1768042382 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279925441137 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963816101292 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688924632536 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185983326252 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725976748803 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.