Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development, while other people think that other countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are conflicting views in terms of whether the growing global trade activities and interactions among countries is advantageous, or such development is the culprit behind the degradation of cultural identity in many countries.
On the one hand, many people think that national identity can disappear if cultural and business bonding among countries are strengthened. This is because the constant stream of marketing campaigns by international firms has led to the dominance of foreign eating habits and fashion trends, whereas indigenous lifestyles and languages become less favorable among young generations. Therefore, they could try to imitate those foreign cultures and languages blindly and change their traditional ways of life. Thus, a large number of minority languages are on the edge of extinction as their people prefer to communicate in widely used languages like English or Chinese. Taking a look back in the history of humankind, plenty of distinct civilizations are assimilated and vanished, starting with the loss of their own language.
On the other hand, numerous individuals have a belief that the growing cross-cultural communication and economic cooperation is a beneficial process. They presume that globalization has boosted economic development and has created a better intercultural understanding on a global scale. Firstly, this helps people all over the world purchase and sells products at a competitive price, promoting productivity and improving the economy. It can also generate more employment opportunities for locals. Secondly, culture exchange allows people to have more contacts with others from different backgrounds, which could eliminate misunderstandings between countries. Therefore, conflicts can be effectively avoided, and this helps to build a harmonious world.
From my point of view, both arguments are the true reflections about the possible consequences of an increasing economic and cultural interaction among nations. It boosts economic integration and speeds up modernization but also creates tensions between global culture and a country’s national identity. Therefore, we should take the initiative in fighting to protect our distinct culture and identity from being submerged by other cultural or economic influences.
In conclusion, the rising international trade has many positive influences on the global economy and world peace. However, its negative impacts on national identities cannot be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | buihonghai | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | buihonghai | 89 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Young people from rich countries are spending time for unpaid works in poor countries. Why ? Who benefit more, young peole or poor countries ? 73
- Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ? 78
- It is difficult for people in the cities getting enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions? 89
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development, while other people think that other countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e their traditional ways of life. Thus, a large number of minority languages are on the edge of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.891966759 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21757523883 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612188365651 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9486442825 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241562292562 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685206242896 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648977780787 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118428141489 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378429971186 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.