Young people from rich countries are spending time for unpaid works in poor countries. Why ? Who benefit more, young peole or poor countries ?
There is a growing number of youngsters from prosperous countries doing unsalaried jobs in underdeveloped nations. The reasons for this are various and it is beneficial for both young individuals and poverty-stricken countries as a whole.
There are two principal factors which explain this matter. The first and foremost reason is the spread of information today. The development of media coverage, such as TV, radio, newspaper, and especially the internet, has brought videos and images about the poverty of needy communities to the richer worlds. It has created an urge for the youth to take action. Many young individuals have decided to travel and spend months or even years to help the people who are in need. Another reason is the emergence of cheap airline carriers. This has made it easier for young men and women who have a tight budget to go abroad to remote corners of the world. And doing unpaid jobs pays bonuses for both young people and less developed communities.
On the one hand, participating in voluntary works benefits young generation not only their upcoming jobs but also their future lives. This broadens their horizons and experiences about the local cultures and indigenous people. Young adults would have a profound understanding about the misery and hardship of needy native people. This will make them learn about the value of money and foster a great sense of humanity and selflessness, which help those young adults develop spiritually and bring them a feeling of self-satisfaction. In addition, those graduates and undergraduates will build their own social network and polish their resumes by getting involved in social activities such as teaching and building accommodation for the poor.
On the other hand, people in underprivileged nations would gain numerous benefits from the work of young volunteers from affluent countries. This would heighten their living standards to some extent. The goods, work and knowledge given by those youngsters might have a significant impact on improving living conditions for the people in local communities, especially who are suffering from natural disasters such as earthquake or tsunami.
In conclusion, there is a variety of reasons why the youth from developed countries have gone to underdeveloped countries to do voluntary works. And the volunteers who give help and the communities that receive assistance might gain equal benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-14 | buihonghai | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | buihonghai | 73 | view |
- Young people from rich countries are spending time for unpaid works in poor countries. Why ? Who benefit more, young peole or poor countries ? 73
- Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ? 78
- The diagram shows how a type of tent called a tepee is built Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d building accommodation for the poor. On the other hand, people in underprivil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33681462141 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93837057527 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543080939948 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5256841935 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309900492505 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783966251273 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724544795568 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166385694072 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035411903365 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.