Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
In the age of industrialization, it is true that the effects of modern communication technology are a highly prevalent issue in our community. Numerous people believe that it has adverse influences on social relationships. Personally, I partly agree with this notion.
On the one hand, technological advances In communication could lead to social isolation and depression. People who spend too much time chatting online instead of interacting face to face with their family or friends are separating themselves from the real world. We can hardly ever find a true friend who is willing to help us overcome our challenges in life just by talking on the internet. Many of us might experience feelings of depression and isolation when realizing that we have many friends in our virtual world, while in the real world there is no one with who we can share joy and sadness. Technological developments in the field of communication could put people’s love lives at risk. Many couples decide to solve their problems via email or Facebook instead of meeting in person, which, in my opinion, makes the situation become even worse. This is because text messages or icons cannot help us understand other people’s true feelings, which easily causes misunderstanding and communication breakdowns.
On the one hand, Firstly if used wisely, electronic communication tools can help strengthen our social relationships. Facebook, Skype, or other apps give people the opportunity to make friends with people from other parts of the world. Secondly, technology has made it much easier for people to keep in contact with their friends or loved ones. In the past, people had to write letters as a way of communication with those living far away and it often took several days or even weeks for those letters to reach their receivers. With to help of technological devices and applications, it only takes several minutes or even seconds to send an email or a text message.
In conclusion, though technology has certainly revolutionized communication between people, it still contains potential risks. However, I believe that it is up to us how to utilize state-of-the-art communication technology to take advantage of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | quang31012004 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-25 | besuxinh | 89 | view |
- The line graph shows information about the salary players of three sports received on a yearly basis measured in dollars over a period of 31 years from 1970 to 2000 87
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 30
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical serviceshould not be run by profit making companies 67
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies 82
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally, I partly agree with this notion. On the one hand, technological advances ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...standing and communication breakdowns. On the one hand, Firstly if used wisely,...
^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...akes several minutes or even seconds to send an email or a text message. In conclusion, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20224719101 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17313794908 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5234182933 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.941176471 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211530516785 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723371489781 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420154286599 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141505578209 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440439806248 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.